Jump to content

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 38 minutes ago by Túrelio in topic SKERQ872873

Shortcuts: COM:ANV • COM:AVI • COM:AIV

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
129, 128, 127, 126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

To create a report, please click on the button above and fill the fields. Alternatively you may copy the following template, replacing USER/TEMP ACCOUNT and REASON with your content, and place it at the bottom of this page:

{{subst:Report vandal|USER/TEMP ACCOUNT|REASON. ~~~~}}

Nuke them

[edit]

User: Nuke them (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Locked as sock of Flagvisioner, and has recreated a lot of files that have been previously deleted. Emk9 (talk) 21:54, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done All files deleted, and I blocked Flagvisioner as well. Yann (talk) 22:34, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I said this on Flagvisioner's userpage but I'll also put it here. I forgot that there's various socks such as Flagvisioner2026 and Flagvisioner2025 (which are presumably impersonation attempts) and that the lock message on Nuke them likely was referring to those socks instead of Flagvisioner. My apologies for the confusion. Emk9 (talk) 23:41, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I believe that by Flagvisioner's userpage, Emk9 means User talk:Flagvisioner (their user talk page, not their "userpage".
@Yann, assuming what Emk9 now says is correct, you should not have blocked Flagvisioner. They do not appear to be the sockmaster. Also, this would make your edits to User:Flagvisioner and User:Nuke them wrong (the latter in terms of who is sockmaster). Could you unblock them and revert those edits? Or do you think I'm wrong? If I don't hear from you on this here within a few hours, I'll review this more closely and consider unblocking Flagvisioner myself. - Jmabel ! talk 00:56, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have unblocked Flagvisioner. Yann unless you think I have this wrong, you probably owe them an apology. - Jmabel ! talk 06:41, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
OOPS. Sorry, I got confused by the similar usernames. Yann (talk) 08:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

FrenchGuianaBall

[edit]

User: FrenchGuianaBall (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Recreating files that were previously created by the locked sock Nuke them and then deleted yesterday. Emk9 (talk) 07:36, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please do not block indefinitely and do not lock as a sock of Flagvisioner! FrenchGuianaBall (talk) 07:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
and do not delete the recreated files of flags of French Guiana! FrenchGuianaBall (talk) 07:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done Blocked indef., all files deleted. Yann (talk) 08:18, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done. I declined unblock request. User is now globally locked. Taivo (talk) 06:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sib01 Bis

[edit]

User: Sib01 Bis (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: The user abuses a category description to engage in (self-)promotion, disguising it as a "minor edit" (see Diff). Many of their other edits are strange, to say the least, such as this extremely long image description which would probably be better suited to Wikinews. Their upload File:Beautiful life 001.jpg appears to be an AI-altered version of File:Moni how are you, hi everyone.jpg. --Kompetenter (talk) 22:00, 14 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done indef-blocked. Various bad edits; the most charitable explanation would be that they completely misunderstand the nature of this site. - Jmabel ! talk 06:23, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm not volunteering to go through and work out waht here should be kept or not, but it would be good if someone did that. - Jmabel ! talk 06:27, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
I created Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sib01 Bis but there are still 16 left. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:02, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done All files deleted, either copyvios or out of scope personal images. Yann (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
No great loss. I had nominated the worst, but the remaining 16 probably wouldn't have survived a DR either. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Unblock request declined. Yann (talk) 20:28, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lafuzz1

[edit]

User: Lafuzz1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Cross-wiki linkspam Dodowp (talk) 00:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Dodowp: Already done, locked thanks to XXBlackburnXx.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 04:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hacıhüsrev1903

[edit]

User: Hacıhüsrev1903 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism XReport --Wooze 11:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Already done Already globally locked. Yann (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

~2026-20270-28

[edit]

User: ~2026-20270-28 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism. Long-term abuse. Block evasion. see filter log, Jermboy Sock XReport --All the Best -- Chuck Talk 17:53, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Blocked, all edits deleted or reverted. Yann (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

הצורר הגדול

[edit]

User: הצורר הגדול (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism-only account. Blocked on hewiki for same reason. TheStriker (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done indef-blocked. - Jmabel ! talk 20:55, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oppod123

[edit]

User: Oppod123 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Please delete all translations created by this user as machine translations. See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Telesonp. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 22:48, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

User is globally locked but appears to have spammed the the Hawaiian Hausa version of Commons:Abuse filter with a lot of edits; I can't revert them as Twinkle tells me it's protected Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 02:56, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

ውስየጥስል1

[edit]

User: ውስየጥስል1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Spam only account WhitePhosphorus (talk) 02:49, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edits mass-reverted; please report to m:SRG (I'm blocked on Meta lol) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 02:54, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done: indeffed by Shizhao and globally locked. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:46, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ms Bisnu gain agro farm

[edit]

User: Ms Bisnu gain agro farm (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: COM:ADVERT. XReport --Sakurase (talk) 11:15, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've given the user a warning not to advertise. As they had only 2 edits, that should be sufficient for now. --Túrelio (talk) 11:53, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
What about the name? That's also promotional (of an organisation), it is very clear that the user is here only to advertise/promote his agro farm. Shaan SenguptaTalk 02:57, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

ALPHASKYYYXXX

[edit]

User: ALPHASKYYYXXX (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: COM:PORN, Harassment of users who nominated their files for deletion Dronebogus (talk) 11:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=men%27s+thongs&title=Special%3AMediaSearch&type=image
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=adult+diaper&title=Special%3AMediaSearch&type=image
"Diapered sissy schoolgirl" is allowed, but Adult Diaper with Fading Wetness indicator is not.
I'm urgently pleading you to be reasonable, yet you add insult to injury by claiming I'm "harassing" you. I think I've been particularly picked on and it isn't fair that my material gets categorized as porn.
Category: Men's thongs - So I post a plain picture of my butt in a thong. There is nothing overtly sexual about any of my images. I am just demonstrating what the topic is that I'm posting in. Look at some of the other photos posted in the topics - they're accompanied by slutty outfits, BDSM and so forth.
It isn't reasonable at all for me to be especially picked on like this, yet at this point it seems futile to get you to see things from my perspective. ALPHASKYYYXXX (talk) 03:54, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

[REDACTED]

[edit]

User: [[:User:%5BREDACTED%5D|[REDACTED]]] ([[:User talk:%5BREDACTED%5D|talk]] · [[:Special:Contributions/%5BREDACTED%5D|contributions]] · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: vandalism edits Prototyperspective (talk) 11:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Prototyperspective: Already done thanks to Achim55.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:14, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

PortoFan98

[edit]
✓ Done Blocked indef. Yann (talk) 17:13, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bedpersonals

[edit]

User: Bedpersonals (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Spam / spambot XReport --NDG (talk) 18:25, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Already done: Globally locked. --Achim55 (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

세일봇

[edit]

User: 세일봇 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: cross-wiki vandalism, need to rollback their spam TTSolitaire (talk) 00:38, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have performed the rollback. Indef his needed here. Shaan SenguptaTalk 01:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done - Jmabel ! talk 07:30, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lilboy3828 & Bitoche

[edit]
Reason for reporting: Vandalism XReport --MathXplore (talk) 02:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Comment more like porn Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, idk, File:Teen penis.jpg? Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 03:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Support indef and revdel all edit revisions and edit summaries. See UserPage and this. Shaan SenguptaTalk 03:39, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
 Not blocked yet Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 07:43, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Reason for reporting: See UserPage, Revision #1198493398, Revision #1198490572, Revision #1157668208 and all other contribs of the user. Indef and redaction of edit summary as well as revision is needed. I didn't start a new thread bcoz both are the same types. Shaan SenguptaTalk 03:39, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Indeffed by Jmabel. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 07:44, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel, thanks for the block, revdel is needed for the contribs of the users. I won't further mention revision links as it is not right as well as all of them needs to be hidden. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Things don't happen instantly. Did I say I was finished?
FWIW, I am following up things related to this that seem to me to have entered the realm of raising legal issues by other users. - Jmabel ! talk 08:02, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Obviously, I should've waited. I know pings can be irritating when in mid of something. Sorry again. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done It was tricky to clean this up: some of these messages were over a year old and had been left sitting there, so I had to suppress an awful lot of page history to truly get rid of them. - Jmabel ! talk 08:40, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

This raises an issue

[edit]

Not stuff I was happy to have to wade through; I've never encountered some of this on Commons before, maybe because it does usually go through Legal rather than through admins. Question to other admins or anyone else who knows policy well: may I presume that somewhere we have a policy that even if a user has posted sexually related content, and even if all concerned are of legal age, it is not appropriate for any user to post to another user's talk page soliciting sexting (or similar requests)? Remarkably, I see nothing at COM:User talk pages that even touches on using the user talk page to reach out inappropriately to another user. It seems to me that the user talk pages are a public enough space that even if this is welcomed by the person in question, this is inappropriate. - Jmabel ! talk 08:40, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

SKERQ872873

[edit]
✓ Done. Indef-blocked for vandalism, personal attacks on other users and expressedly stated intention to spam copyvios[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ooooooo1OO

[edit]

User: Ooooooo1OO (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism XReport --NDG (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Already done: Globally blocked. Thanks for reverting! --Achim55 (talk) 08:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply