Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2026 at 07:34:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#New Zealand
Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:34, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:34, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2026 at 06:42:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora
Info Cynictis penicillata in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park. Сreated by Nagarjun – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 06:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 06:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2026 at 04:36:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
Info View eastward through the Carolingian octagon of Aachen Cathedral with the Romanesque Barbarossa Chandelier (c. 1165–70) and the neo-Byzantine mosaics of the upper gallery (1896–1902) toward the Gothic choir hall.
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 04:36, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 04:36, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2026 at 20:29:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Jewellery_and_objects_of_precious_metals
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Info Imperial face of the Cross of Lothair, an Ottonian crux gemmata from the Rhine-Meuse region, c. 1000, in the Aachen Cathedral Treasury. At the crossing, an antique cameo with the portrait of the laurel-crowned Emperor Augustus; on the lower arm, the engraved rock crystal seal inscribed with the name of King Lothair II of Lotharingia (855–869). Techique: hand-held, focus stack
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2026 at 13:58:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena/Weather#Storms
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 13:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Funny picture, but blurry, bad light and tilted... sorry... Gzzz zz 16:37, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- It was night and in the middle of a storm; I agree that the conditions weren't the best for getting everything crystal clear. Wilfredor (talk) 17:36, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose A very interesting scene, but the execution doesn't convince me. The image seems a little flat in regards of contrast, and the composition doesn't lead the viewer's eyes towards the car too well. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:53, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- It may feel flat because, even though the scene looks calm, there’s actually a strong blizzard and heavy snowfall and for some reason, the photo makes it look as if everything has already passed, it’s similar to photographing rain, the drops often don’t show up, so it can seem like it isn’t raining at all unless you use a very fast shutter speed Wilfredor (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2026 at 09:17:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#United Kingdom
Info all by TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 09:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- TheBritinator (talk) 09:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment The perspective distortion is in my opinion overcorrected on the right (two thin towers), don't you think so ? Gzzz zz 16:43, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Quite right, I have uploaded a new version that should make it better. It should be noted that the front of the cathedral is naturally titled to the right slightly. It may appear exaggerated from this angle. TheBritinator (talk) 17:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:33, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support :-) Gzzz zz 22:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2026 at 08:02:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Turkey
Info Interior of one of the domes of Conqueror’s Pavilion, Topkapı Palace, Istanbul, Turkey. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition. TheBritinator (talk) 08:46, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 09:18, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2026 at 08:00:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species : Panthera leo (Lions)
Info Mating lions (Panthera leo), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support No reasonable expectation of privacy outdoors, I guess... JayCubby (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2026 at 05:40:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Ukraine
Info Kyiv Pechersk Lavra in the morning mist. Created by KyivMax – uploaded by KyivMax – nominated by Nurtenge -- Nurtenge (talk) 05:40, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Nurtenge (talk) 05:40, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful scene, conditions, and composition, which, for me, clearly outweigh the slight lack of sharpness – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Stunning scene, but sadly the highlights are too harsh for me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2026 at 03:41:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#Europe
Info created by NASA/Scott Kelly – uploaded by Ras67 – nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 03:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 07:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 22:40:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Germany
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 22:40, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment Looks too dark Poco a poco (talk) 11:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- I added more light but the scene is very dimly lit, which is why the light bulbs are on. Wilfredor (talk) 12:56, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment Barrel distortion, slight clockwise tilt – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:28, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 21:13:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Greece
- All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 21:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- View of the northeastern point of Crete from the peak of Petsophas. The peak during the minoan time (2nd millenium BCE) was a significant sanctuary of the town below it. The calm sea and sunlight farmland contrasts with the omnimous rain clouds.
Support -- C messier (talk) 21:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose The composition doesn’t quite do it for me, I feel as though there might be a little too much sky – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 20:00:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Denmark
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz zz 20:00, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gzzz zz 20:00, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 07:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Feels a bit overprocessed – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:31, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Julian. Looks overprocessed and oversharpened. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 19:06:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed
Info created by Unknown – uploaded by User:Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 19:06, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 19:06, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 19:01:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Rod Waddington – uploaded by Red panda bot – nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support This photo reminds me of Poco a poco's South Sudanese featured pictures. -- ★ 19:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 19:26, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment personality rights template is needed IMHO --Ezarateesteban 21:40, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Added. ★ 23:02, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose No reason to increase size (last version with "More MB (size)"). The original from flickR is not a RAW, thus the quality is certainly optimum at the beginning. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- I just increased the size since 1,54 MB is too low. Quality is the same as the initial version (no artifacts). ★ 03:49, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- The quality is lower now and your version is worse -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:59, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Increasing size for the sake of increasing size is meaningless. If anything, I'd hope to have the file size of my images as low as possible while preserving the quality for the sake of accessibility. TheBritinator (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. Reverted. Yann (talk) 08:01, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- You reverted to the initial version but still opposes it. Why? ★ 15:40, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Only one word for description, are you mocking us? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- The word refers to Karamoja, the region where probably the photo was taken. PS: My question was not answered. ★ 04:22, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- Only one word for description, are you mocking us? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support For the original version without size alteration --Wilfredor (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support per Wilfredor – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 03:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:41, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 16:43:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Montenegro
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Thumbnail doesn't do it justice. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:12, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:13, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 08:55, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:24, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:41, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 15:44:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Single_stained_glass_windows
Info Detail of the romanesque stained glass window devoted to St. Margaret (Margaretenfenster, 1230–40), collegiate church Ardagger, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:44, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 15:44, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice work, good quality. --Yann (talk) 17:15, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Bwag (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Colourful; interesting subject matter depicted in the window. Gatoclass (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Well executed. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:12, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:40, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 12:14:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Grunpfnul – uploaded by Grunpfnul – nominated by Grunpfnul -- Grunpfnul (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Grunpfnul (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Unreadable blurry text is distracting at the foreground. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- I would suggest removing the text but I don't know if that would be enough. I agree that it's pretty distracting. TheBritinator (talk) 07:13, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. Also unflattering portrait. Yann (talk) 08:03, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Basile. There is also a lot of space above the subject. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 20:08, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 08:06:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Picidae_(Woodpeckers)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 19:27, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:12, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 21:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2026 at 06:32:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info The Friedrichsplatz with its historic water tower in Mannheim in the morning light in spring. Created, uploaded and nominated by me -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:32, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Abstain as author. The “Mannheimer Wasserturm” is an iconic landmark of the city of Mannheim in the Rhine-Neckar region, yet in its main category there are neither particularly really good made photos nor any other QIs, let alone a FP. -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:32, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment Very good composition but blurred bird spoils the photo. Can you please remove it? (I think it would be easy to retouch it) Юрий Д.К. 17:45, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment I agree, the bird is very distracting. I would remove it. TheBritinator (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Юрий Д.К., @TheBritinator: Thanks very much for your feedback, I had already suspected that not everyone would like it this way, and the composition certainly looks cleaner without the birds. But they didn't bother me; I thought the scene, as it was originally, was also fitting. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:59, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The top crop is far too tight, same to the right Poco a poco (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a Poco – Julian Lupyan (talk) 08:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2026 at 21:56:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info Portrait of Péter Magyar at Heroes' Square, Budapest (15 March 2026). This photograph has become an international icon of the 2026 political transition in Hungary, symbolizing the end of one era and the beginning of another. It is a professional-grade portrait with over 41,000 transclusions across Wikimedia projects. This version is a crop focused on the subject's expression; digital restoration was limited to technical cleaning of minor scratches and spots to ensure high encyclopedic standards. Created by Bánhalmi Norbert – uploaded by Bánhalmi Norbert – nominated by Bánhalmi Norbert -- Bánhalmi Norbert (talk) 21:56, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Off-centre, not the greatest lighting either. TheBritinator (talk) 19:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you @TheBritinator
- The composition is intentional; placing the subject off-centre adds a sense of direction and purpose to the portrait, which is a common technique in environmental portraiture. The lighting reflects the actual atmosphere of the event (late afternoon sun), providing a realistic and heroic aesthetic that a more 'perfect' or artificial studio lighting would lack.
- Other version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peter-Magyar-Budapest-15-03-2026.jpg Bánhalmi Norbert (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- I understand, but I just don't really like this kind of portrait. It could very well just be me. TheBritinator (talk) 20:42, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification, @TheBritinator. I respect that personal tastes differ. My goal was to capture the raw, atmospheric reality of the moment rather than a polished studio look. It’s interesting to see how different viewers react to it—meanwhile, the community's response has been overwhelming, with the file reaching nearly 5 million views and 50,000+ transclusions in just a few weeks. I appreciate your input Bánhalmi Norbert (talk) 21:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- I understand, but I just don't really like this kind of portrait. It could very well just be me. TheBritinator (talk) 20:42, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, I think the off-centre framing works very well and lends a sense of dynamism to the image. Gatoclass (talk) 23:43, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I agree. Good example of lead room. ★ 03:55, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, I think the off-centre framing works very well and lends a sense of dynamism to the image. Gatoclass (talk) 23:43, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Good portrait, high value. Yann (talk) 08:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, can't get over the unbalanced composition, harsh lighting (and squinting into the sun) and upward perspective (which doesn't feel intentional). Sharpness isn't great either. AVDLCZ (talk) 15:22, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support In my view, the composition works very well, and the lighting complements it. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Looks great in thumb size but the level of detail is unfortunately just too low, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:18, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 23:26, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2026 at 18:11:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#China
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support May feel a little custrophobic, but the image resonates. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:11, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Nurtenge (talk) 12:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Existing FP is far superior. —kallerna (talk) 17:04, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Not sure if it is so clear cut as "far superior". One is an oversaturated nighttime view and the other is a daytime view with twice the resolution. Each photo has its strengths imo. Also, just a friendly reminder that the guidelines suggest not to make low-effort opposes and to "Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator)." dllu (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Would be fair IMO to at least mention existing FP in the nomination, especially when the composition is this much similar. Also, I do not agree with the guidelines that supporting & nominating an image can be done without hesition, but opposing should be much harder. —kallerna (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Fair point, my bad for not being aware of the existing FP. I did a cursory search and didn't find it under Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#China. Apparently, that image was categorized under cityscapes despite primarily featuring one building only. dllu (talk) 17:53, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- It’s interesting to compare these pictures side by side. The night version has a ‘plastic’, oversaturated, cartoonish look with a weird purple sky and apparently color shifts, all from a regular APS-C sensor. In editing style, it looks as if it pretends to be nice and impactful. The day version is a serious yet magical rendering from a high-end camera; it looks very natural, reassuring, cinematic, and raw, kind of organic, unedited, ‘whole’ that is complete in itself. This is even before looking at the details. To me they compare like day and night, different leagues altogether. That's my personal take on this. I used full screen mode and black background when comparing. --Argenberg (talk) 20:40, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Would be fair IMO to at least mention existing FP in the nomination, especially when the composition is this much similar. Also, I do not agree with the guidelines that supporting & nominating an image can be done without hesition, but opposing should be much harder. —kallerna (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I always wanted to take this shot myself. Unfortunately, the only day I had the chance to plan it, there was a storm. Back then, 13 years ago (Wikimania HK), the camera I used, a D300. But speaking about this photo in particular, I am fully pleased with it as a representation of the place, the contrast with an overwhelming construction. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support The rendering is very special, with a high level of detail from the medium format camera/lens. I especially like that this look is preserved by avoiding any noticeable use of the mid-contrast or clarity sliders. It just breathes. Interesting theme with good composition. I remember residential courtyards very much like this in Yau Tsim Mong and Kowloon City back in the 2000s. The buildings, the floors and rooms were incredibly cramped inside. --Argenberg (talk) 20:36, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support These are different presentations of the same subject, and I think they are both worth the star. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support per Chris Woodrich – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Besides the remarkable much better detail resolution (thanks to medium format camera) of this shot I also prefer the non-centered composition choosen here. Great photo! --Tuxyso (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2026 at 18:09:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#United_Kingdom
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 18:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 18:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:41, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:26, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment Would support, but
Needs more categories. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 23:30, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Info I overwrote the image with a new version with a cooler white balance and with sharpening and denoising turned on (I forgot to turn those on previously when exporting the image). I also added some more categories for the image. dllu (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2026 at 15:14:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Arizona
Info Rain over Grand Canyon, Arizona. Сreated by Romain Guy – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 15:14, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 15:14, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Aspect ratio is a little narrow, but the image arguably contains all the elements it needs regardless. Gatoclass (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:15, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:15, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Nurtenge (talk) 05:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:39, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 07:08, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Gzzz zz 16:34, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 21:08, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:37, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2026 at 08:12:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Turdidae_(Thrushes)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Feedmepaperr (talk) 13:28, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- very attractive and well composed. Gatoclass (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:51, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 08:05, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:32, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Nurtenge (talk) 05:37, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:07, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:37, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2026 at 04:18:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Western_Region_(Vesturland)
Info Kirkjufell with a rainbow during sun and rain. All by me -- Jakubhal 04:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 04:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose -- Unflattering. I'm having a hard time placing exactly why. Could be the haze around the mountain, the visual noise of the water on the left, the blueish green tinge in the sky on the left. Only a weak oppose because there's no technical issues with the photo, the quality, description, license, and categories are fine. Feedmepaperr (talk) 13:25, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Imressing.--Ermell (talk) 13:53, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- evocative. Bonus points for the rainbow. Gatoclass (talk) 14:14, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:19, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support This photo stands out for its powerful atmosphere; the composition is outstanding, and the technical quality is convincing. It's a place I'd love to explore without a plan. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Kirkjufell (463 m) is also called "Church Mountain', derived from its shape resembling a church. Sunshine comes if you are lucky to be there at the right time as there are lots of gray days. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:50, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin, very unique – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:39, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:36, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2026 at 16:02:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
Info View through the entrance of the residential building "To the golden Helmet", the left part of the "Rotes Haus", 8 Laufenstraße, Monschau, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany; to center the chandelier in the doorway, it was unavoidable to photograph the entrance door not from the front, but from a slight angle. Viewed directly from the front, only half of the chandelier is visible. Created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:15, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose IMO nothing special —kallerna (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Quality image but not a spectacular composition, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with others, nothing crazy here. TheBritinator (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 09:35, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2026 at 12:32:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ireland
Info created – uploaded – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:32, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:32, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice. TheBritinator (talk) 16:31, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:21, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:49, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Charming. – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:17, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 21:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:15, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Another age -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Isn't there a discreet distortion of perspective ? Gzzz zz 16:33, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2026 at 18:46:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Earth's_moon
Info created by NASA Johnson Space Center / NASA – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Wikisquack -- Wikisquack (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support as nominator: these last Artemis II pictures are of very good quality, and the "earthsets" and "crescent earth" pictures are quite unsual! -- Wikisquack (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:27, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Feedmepaperr (talk) 10:58, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:14, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 10:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:20, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:40, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Argenberg (talk) 20:33, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Nurtenge (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – So much sharper than those taken by Apollo ! Gzzz zz 16:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2026 at 20:55:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
Info Rock formations and forest by the Yenisei River in Divnogorsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai. Krasnoyarsk Krai is twice the size of Western Europe, while its population is only 1.4% of Western Europe. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:28, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:58, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support A different aspect of Siberia, good detail and reflections. --Tagooty (talk) 10:19, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Feedmepaperr (talk) 10:58, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:15, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:37, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:20, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive rocks, beautiful light. – Aristeas (talk) 16:47, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:16, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:42, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2026 at 18:58:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#China
Info Five Dragon Pavilions in Beihai Park in Beijing. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 19:03, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice crop for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:25, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 16:04, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:52, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:45, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:46, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support On the technically scale it is IMHO oversharpened, but the overall image is very beautiful. --C messier (talk) 21:22, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:16, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 03:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2026 at 10:46:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Noctuidae#Genus : Phlogophora
Info Caterpillar of a lizard moth (Phlogophora meticulosa). Length about 4cm. Focus stack of 17 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 10:46, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 10:46, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice stack, as always! JayCubby (talk) 12:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 19:05, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:00, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice light and impressive level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:57, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Basile Morin --Tagooty (talk) 10:22, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 16:04, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:15, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:16, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 21:10, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2026 at 04:35:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery:Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather#Fog
Info Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) in the mist. Reed bed on the bank of the Langweerderwielen in the mist. I took the risk of posting this simple photo here. Because, in my opinion, many unnecessary details remain hidden by the fog, and the reed bed comes fully into its own.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 06:46, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 20:23, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:00, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:40, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:51, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:55, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice minimalist composition. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 19:45:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Jewellery_and_objects_of_precious_metals
Info Simeon Reliquary with the Presentation of Jesus at the Temple, Aachen Cathedral Treasury. Gilded silver, precious stones, enamel, stone cuttings; Aachen, circa 1330/1340, relic chest (altar): 13th century. Photographic technique: hand-held focus-stack.
Comment First I considered nominating a set (see alternative version) but finally decided for a single nomination of this beautiful reliquery.
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:45, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:45, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support High level. How beautiful object ! How beautiful picture !I like the red reflections. I hope a speedy promotion. --Jebulon (talk) 22:39, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 07:42, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:36, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 14:01, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:31, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:00, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:18, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:51, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Gzzz zz 16:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 19:24:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info Fragment of the Mandelbrot set. 8x SSAA. – nominated by Aokoroko -- Aokoroko (talk) 19:24, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 19:24, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment Though I've been spoiled by PantheraLeo1359531's gigapixel fractals, I think this could probably be rendered at a higher resolution than ~16MP. JayCubby (talk) 20:37, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- XD Thanks for this anekdote :D. Of course, we could say that a 100 MP file could be rendered, but as long as the code is given and allows to recreate this file, it is okay right now. Of course, when we have 2035 and may demand more, we can render a larger file ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:41, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:01, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Neutral -- I don't know if it's just me but this seems a bit unimpressive compared to the rest of the images in that category. Although I will say I don't know much about fractals. Feedmepaperr (talk) 11:06, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:50, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 15:40:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Vitaceae
Info Wine leaves (vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera) at a vineyard in Gumpoldskirchen, taken at sunset. After the harvest, people gather at Austria's "Heurige" to enjoy young wine and other seasonal specialities. All by me. -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting experiment but the mix of light and shadows doesn't work in my view. Perhaps the sun was still too intense at this time? Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Thank you for the feedback. Do you think an alternative with darker shadows/a bit lower exposure could work? --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 06:29, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the post-processing is not the issue here. The light seems too harsh at the beginning -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Basile Morin. TheBritinator (talk) 17:49, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 04:15, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The lighting is cute, but what is the subject matter? Some leaves and twigs? This just doesn't work for me, sorry. Gatoclass (talk) 14:57, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Strong support Wonderful artistic value. I find the strong light was captured well. From my perspective, this picture complements its subject matter and goes far beyond pure utility. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:48, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 13:16:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Finland
Info: former inventory chambers of the Suomenlinna Fortress, converted to a museum / visitor centre. Another old photo of mine; submitting for consideration on the basis of special light. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:16, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:16, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting sky but the architecture, bridge and flags are unexceptional in my view. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice! Юрий Д.К. 17:06, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Basile, not sure whether I'd call that building extraordinary either Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Dull lighting and per Poco, the building just doesn't look very interesting. Gatoclass (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 13:09:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info: Gothic portals of the Orvieto Cathedral, Umbria. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 13:22, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support In my opinion, a beautiful, well-balanced photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I might sharpen a little, though. JayCubby (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 20:23, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- It's often hard to pick a place to stop when framing detail shots like this, this is well-chosen. Acroterion (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:40, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:50, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:54, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Beautiful building, but compositionally I don't like how the circular rose window on top is cut off like that. Also, the image has some minor uncorrected pincushion distortion. The white balance here also seems a great deal warmer than most images in Category:Facade of Duomo di Orvieto but it is probably acceptable (perhaps the limestone is naturally yellowish and the other photos in the category are too cool). Finally, it's also my personal opinion that for static architectural photos in good light, we can do better than a phone photo from a 6 year old smartphone, but I suppose the sharpness and resolution are alright compared to many other FP candidates. dllu (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 12:12:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida
Info created by Moshe Neeman – uploaded by Yedidya Popper – nominated by YedidyaPopper -- YedidyaPopper (talk) 12:12, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- YedidyaPopper (talk) 12:12, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Smallish image (2.7m pixels), description needs work, could use with more categories as well. The image itself is fine but the right claw and right legs are slightly out of focus, as is the top left corner in general. Feedmepaperr (talk) 12:20, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Jebulon (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose - per Feedmepaper. Gatoclass (talk) 13:53, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 11:35:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#North Macedonia
Info The excavations on the archaeological site conducted in 2001 discovered artefacts from the Neolithic, and the fortress with the settlement around it was identified with the late antique Roman town of Armonia. The previous nomination fell short of being promoted as it did not gain enough traction. I still think this is a very good composition with great lighting that deserves to be featured. All by me. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Good quality photo but the pole and metal structure are a bit yellow. Also possible slight chromatic aberration, and the plant in the bottom left is a bit distracting. Feedmepaperr (talk) 11:52, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Feedmepaperr: Thank you for your review. I've uploaded a new version with a more neutral colour tone, as the yellow contrast was really strong even for golden hour, and removed the traces of chromatic aberration. I know that the tree branches in the bottom left are unfortunate, but I think their colour blends well with the rest of the composition. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 13:32, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:48, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I like the contrast of very different texture/structures – the natural rocks, the stone walls, the metal cross. – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per previous nomination. —kallerna (talk) 17:09, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:18, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2026 at 10:17:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz zz 10:17, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gzzz zz 10:17, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Quality, name, description, and license are fine. Lacking wow factor in my opinion. Feedmepaperr (talk) 10:30, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support: strangely elongated fingers is what creates wow for me. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:37, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:36, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Support A fascinating detail, congrats! – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:04, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing featurable here IMO —kallerna (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2026 at 09:34:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 09:34, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 09:34, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Support: pleasant composition and geometry of forms and shadows --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:33, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:56, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, it isn't talking to me. I wonder how it looks to a later time with nicer light and longer shadows, but like this it isn't extraordinary to me Poco a poco (talk) 19:03, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice weather but low wow factor in my view. Metallic structure in the foreground showing redundant vertical frames, and buildings in the background are a bit too ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Subject matter is a yawn, sorry. Gatoclass (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Poco a Poco – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:54, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2026 at 04:17:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/India#Arunachal Pradesh
Info created and uploaded by Rohit Sharma – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 04:17, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 04:17, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:40, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Support The low viewpoint makes this image stand out. --Tagooty (talk) 05:15, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:41, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, it's a pretty view but the level of detail is not really good Poco a poco (talk) 11:04, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I must agree with Poco a poco. The image almost feels blurry to me. TheBritinator (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a Poco – Julian Lupyan (talk) 08:11, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
File:Gabriel climbing a slope, Parque Ribeirinho Oriente, Lisbon, Portugal julesvernex2.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2026 at 05:06:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Playing (having fun)
Info created by Julesvernex2 – uploaded by Julesvernex2 – nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 05:06, 9 April 2026 (UTC)- One of the sweetest and most charming photos I’ve seen in a while. It really struck me: you can’t tell if the little one is crawling or climbing. Lovely. Spiderman?--Lmbuga (talk) 05:06, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 05:06, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- Obrigado Miguel, meu e do Homem-Aranha :) Um abraço, Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:17, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Resolution may be a bit on the lower side, but that's okay. TheBritinator (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Me gustan este tipo de tomas, diferente de lo que solemos ver en esta sección, algo mas humano como colocarse los lentes del padre/madre, una situación cotidiana dentro de una etapa importante del crecimiento, existen aspectos que muchas veces pasamos por alto. Consigo ver al nino corriendo por un lugar empantanado antes de lanzarse al piso a gatear. Muchas gracias por el aporte. Eso convierte esta sección en algo menos predecible. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is OK, but I miss something special to be FP. --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per heylenny. I'm missing something special here, and the child isn't captured in a very flattering way. Did it simply fall? The message of the image remains unclear. --Milseburg (talk) 09:15, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Perhaps a quality image but not special enough in my view. Unfortunately the face is not visible -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Not one of my absolute favourites among all your great photos, Julesvernex2, but in the end this just confirms how many excellent and (at least for me) fascinating photos you have contributed. ;–) Lmbuga’s description is apt, and in the end it depends on our perspective: if we like the ambiguity of the situation between crawling or climbing, we can’t fail to fall for this photo; if we dislike the puzzle, we will not like the image. It’s fine for me that the face is turned away: first this is just logical because Gabriel is crawling or climbing; second it could be a real privacy problem if we would see his face, depending on the interpretation of some finer points of GDPR, so with the face turned away we are all on the save side. – Aristeas (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose nothing special imo —kallerna (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Nurtenge (talk) 05:49, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
File:Building demolition jaw MD3.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2026 at 02:06:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info A hydraulic demolition jaw knocking down a hotel, created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 02:06, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 02:06, 9 April 2026 (UTC)- Please add location. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:47, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the location.
conditionalsupport provided you reduce the AI sharpening. I would be OK with some motion blur here. JayCubby (talk) 13:16, 9 April 2026 (UTC)- Yeah, that was too much. I've gone back to the first version with some slightly blurred falling blocks. The bright speckles are airborne debris, not artifacts. Acroterion (talk) 22:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you Acroterion, speaking of artifacts, there is some sort of tiling glitch (?) in the top-left corner. Could the highlights be reduced any? JayCubby (talk) 23:38, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- Not sure I'm seeing what you're describing, but I think the highlight in the lower left corner could be knocked down. Acroterion (talk) 00:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you Acroterion, speaking of artifacts, there is some sort of tiling glitch (?) in the top-left corner. Could the highlights be reduced any? JayCubby (talk) 23:38, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, that was too much. I've gone back to the first version with some slightly blurred falling blocks. The bright speckles are airborne debris, not artifacts. Acroterion (talk) 22:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- Per Jay. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Aciarium: Did you want to cast a vote here? No offence, I am just asking because the wording (“Per Jay”) suggests to me that your intention was to vote. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thanks for the ping! I don't have too much time at the moment so I missed the changes to the file!
Support --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thanks for the ping! I don't have too much time at the moment so I missed the changes to the file!
Support IMHO this photo deserves a little bit more love. If I look at it in full size it really works for me. Not sharp enough? Well, this is really an action shot. Narrow crop? IMHO think the crop is good because it takes us right into the action. And certainly this photo has high educational value if this is what one is looking for. – Aristeas (talk) 19:20, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- The thing I liked about the image was that the demolition tool has a face and is actively eating the building. I have other images where things are relatively static, but they're not as interesting, and I felt at the time that a little blur would make it look more dynamic. Acroterion (talk) 22:21, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I think the motion blur of the falling debris makes it more dynamic. --C messier (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:25, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Strong support per Aristeas and C Messier. Very dramatic, and well executed all around. Not often you see pictures like this. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2026 at 22:57:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
Info created by Anonymous – uploaded by Fæ – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:57, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:57, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment Overall quite nice. Some flecks remain in the top and bottom areas, and I would consider cloning to straighten the top. JayCubby (talk) 23:40, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment The support shows a fold deformation that creates a visible issue, especially in the upper area. To correct it, a partial crop of the banner appears to have been applied. In addition, the image shows high chromatic noise and excessive contrast. Compression artifacts introduced during the conversion from TIF to JPG are also visible, resulting in a noticeable loss of visual quality. Overall, I believe the restoration could have been carried out in a less invasive manner and with less impact on the original information. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Comment I just do an alternative processing with less changes to original picture, if you prefer it I upload this in this nomination JPG @Wilfredor: @JayCubby: --Ezarateesteban 12:05, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- in this new version the colors seem to have changed drastically from the original Wilfredor (talk) 14:39, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- What color do you prefer ? --Ezarateesteban 17:03, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- It is not really a matter of my personal color preference, but rather that the original TIFF colors appear to have been altered. For example, the lower text has an almost black background, whereas in the original file it is clearly blue. I appreciate the effort, but it seems that the tool being used to render the RAW/TIFF file is affecting the color Wilfredor (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
- I reuploaded the PNG without retouch tone curves, only removed scratches @Wilfredor: --Ezarateesteban 19:03, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- What color do you prefer ? --Ezarateesteban 17:03, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 13 Apr → Sat 18 Apr Tue 14 Apr → Sun 19 Apr Wed 15 Apr → Mon 20 Apr Thu 16 Apr → Tue 21 Apr Fri 17 Apr → Wed 22 Apr Sat 18 Apr → Thu 23 Apr
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 09 Apr → Sat 18 Apr Fri 10 Apr → Sun 19 Apr Sat 11 Apr → Mon 20 Apr Sun 12 Apr → Tue 21 Apr Mon 13 Apr → Wed 22 Apr Tue 14 Apr → Thu 23 Apr Wed 15 Apr → Fri 24 Apr Thu 16 Apr → Sat 25 Apr Fri 17 Apr → Sun 26 Apr Sat 18 Apr → Mon 27 Apr
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:April 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
